SC Orders DDA to Refund Rs 165 Crore With 18 Years’ Interest in Jasola Land Case

• SC directs DDA to refund Rs 165 crore with 7.5% interest in Jasola Land Case
• Total payout may cross Rs 400 crore after 18 years
• Jasola commercial plot acquisition was ruled invalid by courts

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has ordered the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to refund Rs 165 crore along with 7.5% annual interest for nearly 18 years to a private company that had purchased a commercial plot in Jasola through a public auction in 2007. The total amount payable could reportedly exceed Rs 400 crore, making it one of the significant financial setbacks for the authority in a long-running land dispute case.

The ruling once again brings attention to recurring concerns regarding land acquisition procedures and administrative delays within DDA, an authority that has faced criticism from courts on multiple occasions over the years for procedural lapses and delayed actions.

Background of the Case

The dispute relates to a commercial plot in south-east Delhi’s Jasola area. In March 2007, Reliance Eminent Trading and Commercial Pvt Ltd emerged as the highest bidder in a public auction conducted by DDA and paid Rs 165 crore for the property. The company also paid nearly Rs 10 crore towards stamp duty and transfer charges.

Following the payment, DDA executed a freehold conveyance deed in favour of the company in March 2008, effectively transferring ownership rights.

However, the matter took a legal turn years later when the original landowners approached the Delhi High Court in 2015, claiming that they had never received compensation for the acquisition of the land. The High Court accepted their plea and cancelled the acquisition proceedings.

After the High Court’s order, the original owners reportedly reoccupied the land in December 2016. DDA challenged the decision before the Supreme Court, but in May 2017, the apex court upheld the High Court ruling.

At the same time, the Supreme Court gave DDA an opportunity to initiate fresh acquisition proceedings within six months if it still intended to retain the land. The court stated that failure to do so would result in the property reverting permanently to the original owners.

Despite receiving this window, DDA failed to complete fresh acquisition proceedings within the stipulated period.

According to court records, DDA later wrote to the company asking it to bear additional expenses related to fresh acquisition and also face the legal consequences arising from the Supreme Court’s order. The company, however, chose not to continue with the uncertainty and instead sought a refund of the money paid for the plot.

Finding no clear commitment from DDA, Reliance Eminent filed a recovery suit seeking approximately Rs 284 crore, including the principal amount, interest, stamp duty, and property taxes paid up to 2018.

The matter eventually reached the Supreme Court through an appeal.

A bench comprising Justices J K Maheshwari and Atul S Chandurkar ruled in favour of the company and directed DDA to refund the amount with interest.

The court allowed the company to immediately withdraw Rs 186 crore that had already been deposited by DDA before the Delhi High Court. It further directed the authority to pay the remaining amount within eight weeks.

The case highlights the financial and legal risks associated with disputed land acquisitions and delayed administrative action. Legal experts say the judgment serves as a reminder for government agencies to ensure proper compensation and clear ownership before auctioning public land.

Also Read: Greater Noida Circle Rates Increased by 3.58%

Also Read: UP Government Ends Prepaid Smart Meter System, Shifts Consumers to Postpaid Billing